The Tenderee shall complete the review within the specified time after the completion of the evaluation by the Bid Evaluation Committee Some tenderees entrust the bid evaluation committee to directly determine the winning bidder, and some tenderees determine the winning bidder by themselves after the evaluation of the bid evaluation committee is completed, that is, evaluation separation.

common The methods include: spot selection, price competition, vote decision, vote decision and collective selection.

01

Ranking calibration method

According to the ranking recommended by the Bid Evaluation Committee, determine the winning candidate ranking first to win the bid. If the winning candidate ranking first gives up winning the bid, determine the winning candidate ranking second to win the bid, and so on.

02

Bid selection method

In this method, the bid inviter determines the transaction price, and the bidder does not bid. The bid winner is determined by random lottery among all the applicants.

? Advantages: The bidding procedure is simple, and there is no risk and pressure of integrity.

? Disadvantages: neither selecting the best nor bidding.

? Suggestion: From the perspective of being brave or responsible for the construction project, it is not recommended to directly select and sign the bid for general bidding projects.

03

Price competition method

This method refers to the method of taking the bid price as the main basis for bid selection, and the specific method shall be agreed by the bidder in the bidding documents. This method can be extended to a variety of bid determination methods, such as the lowest bid price method, the second lowest price method, the Nth (pre agreed number) low price method, the average value method, etc.

? Advantages: The bidding procedure is simple, and there is bidding.

? Disadvantages: There is no merit function.

? Suggestion: some small projects or projects with simple technology can be used, but it is not recommended to use the price competition method (such as the lowest price method) that may lead to vicious bidding, while the average method or the Nth lowest price will be relatively reasonable.

04

Standard method of voting

This method refers to the method that the bid inviter establishes a bid award committee to determine the successful bidder by direct voting or round by round voting. One time voting method or pairwise comparison ranking method in which the direct vote has a simple majority.

? Advantages: outstanding merit function, with certain bidding function.

? Disadvantages: the pressure of integrity of the main responsible person of the bidder and the risk of integrity of the bid awarding committee are large.

? Suggestion: It can be used for major projects or projects with complex technology, but it should be used with caution for general projects.

05

Bid selection by voting

This method refers to the method that the bid inviter establishes a bid award committee to determine at least three bidders by voting, and then determines the winning bidder by random lottery. The more shortlisted bidders, the weaker the merit function.

? Advantages: It is able to properly price and relatively select the best, and there is no greater risk and pressure of integrity.

? Disadvantages: The bidders with good internal control mechanism can realize the organic combination of merit selection and bidding. The bidders without internal control mechanism do not reflect the risk of price restriction and integrity.

? Suggestion: For general bidding projects, determine the price cut line in advance, and then select the best among the shortlisted bidders. Major projects or projects with complex technology will raise the price to be shortlisted, and the priority will be given to the best.

06

Collective Rules of Procedure

This method refers to that the legal representative or main responsible person of the bid inviter acts as the leader of the bid award committee, establishes the bid award committee for collective discussion, and the bid award committee members give their own opinions, and the leader of the bid award committee finally determines the bid award method of the bid winner. The essence of this method is to give the bidder's legal representative or main person in charge the right to award the bid.

? Advantages: The legal representative or main person in charge of the bidder has the right to award the bid, which can be either merit based or competitive, or an organic combination of merit based and competitive bidding.

? Disadvantages: The bidder's legal representative or main person in charge has great personal integrity pressure and risk.

? Suggestion: If the bidder does not have perfect collective rules of procedure to avoid the risk of integrity and resolve the pressure of integrity, it is not recommended to adopt the collective rules of procedure.

Second Brother Recommended reading: Wuhan Company was named   Wuhan Company was named   Wuhan Company name verification   Company name verification